Surely Aldous went through a different kind of indoctrination, but his body of work implies that he *understands* the elitist agenda (coming from it) but disagrees with it and spent much time and energy, as Ryan pointed out, warning us of it.Then there is a whole slew of damning evidence in the “Aquarian Conspiracy” article. Nothing worries a despot more than the unknown ~ that which cannot be exploited for gain.Re the very interesting link to Indian influences on Hellenic thought (cited in Joseph Pierce comment above Excellent, David Llewellyn Foster. Another coachman, this one quite awake, may pass by the same route and observe the coach in its sad situation. Of course, they’re reduced to microphotos now. The comments never got posted and a lot of things fell into place. Irvin goes too far, in my opinion, per research in Wasson’s psychedelic co-optation, or even Huxley’s and McKenna’s apparent connection with the apparently pro-eugenics Esalen Institute. I think this would be very hard to show without digging up some personal letters, or similar material, from his later life, to show he was completely insincere. I enjoyed Mckenna in my teens but RAW stays as a deep cultural lens through which I see the world and I find his method of conspiracy research much more compelling than just piecing together snippets and calling it a revelation because, there is psychology all sides of every story as well as ambiguous threads of agency/complicity.
But McLuhan did cause a lot of people to think twice about taking their mass-manufactured culture at face value. We could go on forever, depleted uranium, agent orange, chemtrails, the list goes on and on.However, is this the inevitable consequence of families breeding too many children?I think once you have researched into the mechanics of world management ran by the elites, the comprehensive and holistic types of control imposed upon people ranging from the psychological to the material aspects of their lives, you’ll realize that the planet is being torn down not because there’s too many of us, but rather because of the insane people who control the oil based paradigm in which we are all stuck.The battle for your mind is the most important one. I think that the MMGG was co-opted for stage 2 of MKULTRA – though that may be a bit naive and wishful thinking on my part.
Anyone… almost….The problem with being such a dazzlingly good researcher is one spends too much time alone, gets, of necessity, too far into the left brain, gets mad!
There are many and it may allow you to stretch this whole crusade out a bit longer since you obviously derive so much pleasure from it. They don’t have his credentials – they’re just average people. So he says in ´appreciating the imagination´ in Esalen:In his last interview with coasttocoast host he responded to a question, what he would have done different in his life if he had the chance to do so, something like ´he wished he would have been more kind´. He strongly appeared to me to have the mind of an explorer! Sometimes it’s interesting playing with the life of a dead man.This was in ’67 when I was a sophomore in college.
If not, then we can continue to bang our heads against an increasingly ominous wall. I remember my girlfriend at the time smirking with ridicule. That’s obvious. We’ve clearly got them on the run. The Bible.I’m fine with the Bible. ***Another lucky accident was Freud’s inability to hypnotize successfully and his consequent disparagement of hypnotism.This delayed the general application of hypnotism to psychiatry for at least forty years.But now psycho-analysis is being combined with hypnosis; and hypnosis has been made easy and indefinitely extensible through the use of barbiturates, which induce a hypnoid and suggestible state in even the most recalcitrant subjects.”…it is clear to me that Huxley is not at all pleased with the possibilities of mind control technology.The “X” club was so named because “it committed [the group] to nothing.”Neither does the wikipedia article make any mention of eugenics.Were the X Club members zealots about naturalism and natural history?
Haldane criticised all three of them in an article titled “Auld Hornie, F.R.S.”. Who considers it to be a parody of Darwinism? (“In Praise Of Psychedelics”)Well it’s interesting that you brought this up. But if I missed such a summary of your case then please do restate it. We don’t.It gets problematic for people when they believe without questioning a coercive doctrine or law formulated for obedience, not so much appeal.Do you see the difference? Ad verecundiam is about the UNQUESTIONABLE appeal to authority. Just wondering what info you dug up.I mean, if Spock said Dec. 24th, 2011…then you better believe him. If the theory is seriously undercut, then those policies are, at least in theory, harder to justify. Therein, I offer, for an example, Wilson’s philosophy, but instead in the light of more ancient writers and thinkers, such as Sextus Empiricus, who, along with Diogenes Laertius, has preserved much of Pyrrho’s philosophy. Man is so caught up in the toils of mechanical life that he has neither time to stop nor the power of attention needed to turn his mental vision upon himself. This may have been something THEY could have used to steer/blackmail him with.Do you have a reference for that particular talk located elsewhere on the web?no couldn’t find it, but there’s an edited version up at among other places c-realm podcast, but I haven’t compared them.